Add new comment

I believe all the comments above have valid points which could be debated at great length, so here is a little something to ponder as well. God created Man, Man created Government, Government created Laws(Statutes) (As Men, we are above the law, man created law, not God's law or natural law, as it was intended. And as a Jury member we have a right and an obligation to uphold the law, not contract law, but Constitutional Law, Common Law, Natural Laws. Another way of looking at it, God's Law. God, Man, Nature are not separate entities, but one. We as jurors must also remember that not only is the defendant on trial, but so is the "Law" with which he is charged. And if you, individually, find that the law is unjust, then you must act to exonerate the defendant. Don't let the other jurors, prosecutor, or even judge pressure you into doing there bidding when it goes against what you believe to be right. (Ignorance is not only bliss, it is dangerous.) This is the check against legislative and judicial power/coersion.) Back to the subject. These statutes are created to control the corporations,entities that the state has created. I would guess it would be hard to convince anyone, with this logic, that the state had any jurisdiction over the flesh and blood man. So if the state has control, through these statutes, over a corporation/strawman or whatever fictious entity they can dream up, how is it that they can control the flesh and blood man? Through application of the constitution? No, and that is why you will be held in contempt of court if you try asserting your rights as outlined in the constitution. However, the state, having full jurisdiction to adjudicate a case involving a corporation/strawman, can only gain control of the flesh and blood man, if that man agrees to be that corporation/strawman/fiction. This is simply, contract law. Your drivers license is a contract. When you step into a courtroom these days you are entering into an admiralty/maritime jurisdiction where contract law is the only law, not the assumed Constitutional law as we believe it to be. How else could the judge hold you in contempt of court for bringing up the constitution in defending yourself? The flexyourrights website does a good job of outlining some of your rights(constitutional rights), but they should also be aware of the right not to contract with the state, judge, police officer or any other public figure that claims to have authority over them. The authority they claim to have is given through the Uniform Commercial Code(UCC), and again only applies to corporations. Make sure you take yourself out of the commercial environment before asserting your Constitutional rights. However, you have avenues given through the commercial code to assert your constitutional rights because the UCC can only be construed in harmony with the constitution. This is explained in the Uniform Commercial Code(UCC 1-103.6 Recourse) Look it up. I don't have time, nor the room to continue, but before ending, I would argue that the best thing we can do as individuals is to educate ourselves and our children to know that things are not always as they seem. Truth is stranger than fiction. And we as individuals, children of God, still have the power over our governments, not the other way around. Seek the truth, and remember man is flawed, and that laws are created by man. There is more to learn, and I would be happy to discuss it further. Please comment on my submission, I would welcome your opinions.