|
Main Menu
> Just say 'no'...
> BUSTED DVD Info > Our Next Film > About Flex Your Rights > Police Stop Stats > Case Law and You Frequently Asked Questions Flex Success Stories Donate to Flex Your Rights Contact Us Disclaimer FYR Google Search
Sign up for FyR Emails
Receive FREE email updates: BUSTED Endorsements
"BUSTED is a concise, simple lesson in how citizens can give us lawyers a fighting chance." Daniel Dodson, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Board Member Advertisement
|
|
Advertisements
|
I understand, but disagree
You're attempting to point out the hypocrisy of defending citizens' privacy while advocating the taping of police. I'd argue that police have zero expectation of privacy when on duty. Here's why:
1. They wear uniforms designed to make them noticeable.
2. They have badge numbers designed to make them identifiable.
3. They work with shows like COPS which publicize their activities.
4. They report arrests to the media, describing specific details.
5. Trials themselves are a matter of public record, with all details becoming publicly available, including all the officer's actions.
There simply is nothing private about police actions during a citizen encounter. And police, unlike other professionals you've named, literally have the authority to kill people. Society cannot afford to allow anyone to exercise that level of authority over others in private.
There have been so many cases in which gross police misconduct was revealed only through surreptitious taping of officers. In the absence of other effective accountability measures, the need for video is obvious and amply demonstrated.