|
Main Menu
> Just say 'no'...
> BUSTED DVD Info > Our Next Film > About Flex Your Rights > Police Stop Stats > Case Law and You Frequently Asked Questions Flex Success Stories Donate to Flex Your Rights Contact Us Disclaimer FYR Google Search
Sign up for FyR Emails
Receive FREE email updates: BUSTED Endorsements
"As a journalist covering the war on drugs, I’ve often been surprised at how readily people consent to searches. By clearly explaining and vividly illustrating the dynamics of encounters with the police, BUSTED should help people keep their calm -- and their freedom." Jacob Sullum, Reason magazine senior editor and author of Saying Yes: In Defense of Drug Use Advertisement
|
|
Advertisements
|
Here's what it means
Prior to this ruling, California's Supreme Court ruled that even if an officer illegally stopped a vehicle, only the driver could challenge the illegal stop in court; passengers could not. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed, saying that both drivers AND passengers can challenge illegal stops in court.
To illustrate with an example, suppose an officer in California made an illegal traffic stop. After walking up to the car, the officer saw marijuana in the glove compartment, seized it, and arrested both the driver and the passenger for possession of marijuana. Under the California ruling (which is now invalid), the driver would be able to get the marijuana suppressed before trial, but the marijuana would still be admissible in the trial for the passenger. Now that SCOTUS has reversed, both the driver AND the passenger can get the marijuana suppressed.