Justice Department Acknowledges Racial Profiling by Trying to Cover it up

The Justice Department provoked controversy last week when it demoted the Director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics in an attempt to downplay a study showing disparities in the treatment of minorities during traffic stops.

The newly released study revealed two important conclusions:

1. Black, Hispanic, and White drivers were about equally likely to be stopped by police. (This looks good.)

2. Black and Hispanic drivers were significantly more likely to be searched, arrested, handcuffed, beaten, maced, or bitten by dogs. (This looks very, very bad.)

As is its custom, the BJS prepared a press release to announce the findings of this congressionally mandated study, identifying the above conclusions as its most notable findings. The Justice Department intervened, insisting that BJS not publicize that nasty part about minority drivers being more likely to be searched, arrested, handcuffed, beaten, maced, or bitten by dogs.

A conflict emerged in the course of which BJS Director Lawrence A. Greenfeld was removed from his post. His attempt to provide the media with an unbiased summary of his agency’s findings was apparently too much for his superiors at the DOJ. Ultimately, no press release was sent out, and the study was unceremoniously posted in the bowels of the BJS website.

Perhaps this is as close as we’ll ever come to seeing Bush’s Justice Department actually admit that they’re “concerned” about racial profiling. Granted, they show their concern by burying important studies and firing statisticians who are unwilling to politicize empirical data, but at least they noticed that the numbers look bad.

Black and Hispanic drivers we

Black and Hispanic drivers were significantly more likely to be searched, arrested, handcuffed, beaten, maced, or bitten by dogs.

That isn't very meaningful. If they were more likely to be searched/arrested/handcuffed when the cop didn't have probable cause, or there wasn't later a conviction, that would be bad.

But if a higher percentage of black/hispanic drivers had actually commited a crime, then we should rightfully expect a higher percentage of black/hispanic arrests.

As far as being beaten, maced or bitten by dogs, how many of those cases have dash camera footage indicating that the cop was attacked first?

Repeat after me, folks, "correlation is not causation".

(No, I'm not automatically assuming the worst of some ethnic groups. I'm automatically assuming the worst of sloppy research and reporting.)

If we lived in a perfect little world, maybe, but...

You're very right, correlation is not causation.

And if our world was a perfect little world not burdened by mountains of evidence that racisim (intentional, sub-conscious, institutional, and otherwise) didn't plague our country, our country's law enforcement apparatus, and the very laws they enforce (see crack cocaine vs powder cocaine sentencing disparities) then I might agree that much was being made of nothing.

But, we do have evidence, we do hear stories, and to persist in believing that these correlations are nothing more than than that, correlations, seems to me to be strikingly naive. I respect your desire for something more substantial than correlations, like proof or evidence of causation, but that seems very difficult/impossible to come buy in this type of situation. What are we going to do, take a group of randomly selected racist cops and non-racist cops and compare their rates of stops, searches, seizures, and number of times they sick their dogs on people?

If you think that there is a perfectly innocent explanation for all of these statistics showing correlations between horrible events and the race of the victim, you have more faith in America and Americans than I, or any other reasonable person, should have.

Admitting that there is a problem is Step 1.

What do you think can be dedu

What do you think can be deduced from these statistics?

Surprise, Surprise...

As far as I know, there is no evidence or correlation between one's race and their ethnic background. To assume that blacks and hispanics are being searched more frequently then their white counterparts because of their higher incidences of crime is a mistake. Although the data does not show causation for increased search rates or violent contact with officers and k-9's, we should still be concerned with this increased incidence rate and the impact it has on our minority communities.

This is just another example of how this administation tries to control the flow of information. It is not surprising that they would try to ignore this important research seeing that they have been known to pitch propaganda to local media outlets as actual news. With further research I feel that we would uncover a lot more useful information that the Department of Justice would like to ignore as well. Politics and research do not go hand in hand. This data ha no political motives what-so-ever. We are just reporting the facts.

The new website is kick ass Steve and Matt. Mad props, yo!

reply

I think it's the educational system that's to blame. Not every colored person is a drug addict that's for sure but it's the way we are teached i guess.

reply

When are they going to solve this problem anyway ? and how ? we can't brainwash people just ask them to use their heads and rationalize.

Sozdanie I Prodvijenie Saitov

Hi all. The undertaking of a new action brings new strength.
I am from Guyana and also now'm speaking English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "More non google seo how to online marketing resources for.Do it yourself seo guidebook for dummies seo tips and tricks about seo treo."

:) Thanks in advance. Ace.

Post new comment





*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <div> <b> <i>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
Verify comment authorship
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
*
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.